Volvo XC90 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC70 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 4.4 | 2.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 315 HP | 163 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 320 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 8.1 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 14.0 | 7.6 - 11.1 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC90 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 763 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`737 | ~ 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |