Volvo XC90 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo XC90 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 315 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 14.0 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2404 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 448 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 495 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`737 | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |