Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.3 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 - 136 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 100 - 184 NM | 137 - 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 25.2 seconds | 9.2 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 10.3 | 5.4 - 8.3 | |
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`267 | ~ 1`696 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |