Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1988
Mitsubishi Carisma
1995 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.21.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 54 - 136 HP90 - 140 HP
Torque: 100 - 184 NM137 - 265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 25.2 seconds9.2 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 10.35.4 - 8.3
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.38 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1150 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`267~ 1`696
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 16001000
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Carisma has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv