Volvo XC90 2024 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 - 310 HP | 249 - 635 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 420 NM | 500 - 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.7 seconds | 3.8 - 8 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Sport are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC90. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 10.2 | 1.6 - 16.2 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 273 - 281 mm (10.7 - 11.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 647 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1856 litres | 1860 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 345 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`843 kg | ~ 3`306 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`085 kg | ~ 2`479 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 758 kg | ~ 827 kg | |
| Volvo XC90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 58 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |