Volvo XC90 2024 vs Kia Sorento 2024
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Sorento can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Kia Sorento also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Kia Sorento is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 - 310 HP | 160 - 281 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 420 NM | 245 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.7 seconds | 7.4 - 10 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC90 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Kia Sorento. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 10.2 | 1.6 - 9.8 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Sorento. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 174 - 176 mm (6.9 - 6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger. Volvo XC90 is 15 cm longer than the Kia Sorento, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 697 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1856 litres | 2138 litres | |
|
Kia Sorento has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sorento (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`843 kg | ~ 2`550 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`085 kg | ~ 1`908 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 758 kg | ~ 642 kg | |
| Volvo XC90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Kia Sorento. Therefore, Volvo XC90 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 51 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |