Volvo XC90 2024 vs BMW X5 2023
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. BMW X5 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 - 310 HP | 286 - 530 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 420 NM | 450 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.7 seconds | 4.3 - 6.1 seconds | |
| In general, BMW X5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC90. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 10.2 | 1.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 214 - 221 mm (8.4 - 8.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Volvo XC90 is 2 cm longer than the BMW X5, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1856 litres | 1870 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`843 kg | ~ 2`981 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`085 kg | ~ 2`270 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 758 kg | ~ 711 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 59 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |