Volvo XC90 2019 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 - 407 HP | 231 - 422 HP | |
Torque: | 350 - 640 NM | 370 - 900 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 7.9 seconds | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 10.8 | 2.7 - 9.0 | |
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touareg. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.88 m | |
Width: | 1.95 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
Volvo XC90 is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touareg, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 810 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
Volkswagen Touareg has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 442 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touareg. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touareg. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`750 | ~ 2`918 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 45 200 | 53 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |