Volvo XC90 2019 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo XC90 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo XC90 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 - 407 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 640 NM | 246 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | 9.7 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC90 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Land Cruiser. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.5 - 10.8 | 7.4 - 11.7 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Volvo XC90 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC90 is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1886 litres | 1934 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`858 kg | ~ 2`916 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`238 kg | ~ 2`130 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 620 kg | ~ 786 kg | |
| Volvo XC90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 600 | 43 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |