Volvo XC90 2019 vs Toyota Highlander 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Highlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Highlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.4 - 3.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 - 407 HP | 186 - 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 640 NM | 237 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Highlander are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC90. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.5 - 10.8 | 6.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC90 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 454 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1886 litres | 2387 litres | |
|
Toyota Highlander has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 86 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 501 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Volvo XC90 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`858 kg | ~ 2`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`238 kg | ~ 1`947 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 620 kg | ~ 743 kg | |
| Volvo XC90 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Toyota Highlander. Therefore, Toyota Highlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 600 | 47 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |