Volvo XC90 2019 vs BMW X5 2018

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo XC90
2019 -
BMW X5
2018 -
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo XC90 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 (petrol, diesel)2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 235 - 407 HP231 - 462 HP
Torque: 350 - 640 NM450 - 760 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.8 - 7.9 seconds4.7 - 7.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.4 - 10.86.8 - 11.6
Volvo XC90 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.92 m
Width: 1.95 m2.00 m
Height: 1.78 m1.75 m
Volvo XC90 is 3 cm longer than the BMW X5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 368 litres650 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1870 litres
BMW X5 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo XC90 has 282 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Volvo XC90 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`750~ 2`962
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 49 20060 000
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC90 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
BMW X5 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv