Volvo XC90 2019 vs Audi Q7 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 - 407 HP | 231 - 340 HP | |
Torque: | 350 - 640 NM | 450 - 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 7.9 seconds | 5.4 - 7.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 10.8 | 6.9 - 7.1 | |
On average, Volvo XC90 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 5.06 m | |
Width: | 1.95 m | 1.97 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Volvo XC90 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo XC90 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC90 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 865 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1925 litres | |
Audi Q7 has more luggage space. Volvo XC90 has 497 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q7. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC90 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Volvo XC90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`750 | ~ 2`955 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 45 200 | 56 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC90 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |