Volvo XC70 2013 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC70 engine produces 105 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Volvo XC70 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC70 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC70 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC70 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1740 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 1210 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volvo XC70 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Laguna 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo XC70 is larger. Volvo XC70 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC70 has 67 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 1`957 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |