Volvo XC70 2013 vs Citroen C5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC70 engine produces 77 HP more power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Volvo XC70 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC70 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Volvo XC70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C5 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo XC70 is larger. Volvo XC70 and Citroen C5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC70 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`326 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |