Volvo XC70 2007 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC70 engine produces 5 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC70 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC70 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC70 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC70 2007 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC70 2007 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volvo XC70 is 9 cm shorter than the Audi A6, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC70 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 565 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC70 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. The Audi A6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Volvo XC70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC70 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A6 has
| |