Volvo XC70 2002 vs Rover 75 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC70 engine produces 47 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Volvo XC70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC70 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC70 could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC70 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Volvo XC70 has 4x4: Automatic four-wheel drive with torque transfer to rear axle via viscous clutch when front wheels slip. Electronic traction control on front wheels (TRACS), which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo XC70 is 6 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | 1222 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC70 has 85 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC70 (by 419 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |