Volvo XC70 2000 vs Subaru Outback 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC70 engine produces 9 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 3 NM more than Subaru Outback. Despite less power, Volvo XC70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Volvo XC70 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo XC70 is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 12 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | 1649 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC70 has 42 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Volvo XC70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 8 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |