Volvo XC70 2000 vs Subaru Outback 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC70 engine produces 27 HP more power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Subaru Outback. Thanks to more power Volvo XC70 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC70 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC70 could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC70 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
| Volvo XC70 and Subaru Outback are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |