Volvo XC70 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Volvo XC70 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Volvo XC90 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.4 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 304 HP | 163 - 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 440 NM | 320 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.2 seconds | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 10.6 | 8.1 - 11.5 | |
|
Volvo XC70 petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Volvo XC70 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.78 m | |
| Volvo XC70 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC70 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. This could mean that the Volvo XC70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Volvo XC70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`360 | ~ 2`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |