Volvo XC70 2013 vs Volvo V70 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 - 304 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
Torque: | 350 - 440 NM | 240 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.2 seconds | 6.6 - 13.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 10.6 | 4.2 - 10.2 | |
Volvo XC70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Volvo XC70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 151 mm (5.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC70 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.55 m | |
Volvo XC70 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo V70, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC70 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 575 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1580 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`360 | ~ 2`277 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 13 400 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |