Volvo XC70 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 304 HP | 124 - 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 440 NM | 187 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.2 seconds | 9.4 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 10.6 | 4.9 - 8.5 | |
|
Volvo XC70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Volvo XC70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 160 - 187 mm (6.3 - 7.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC70 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Volvo XC70 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC70 is 27 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1705 litres | |
| Volvo XC70 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`360 | ~ 2`124 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |