Volvo XC70 2010 vs Audi A6 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 304 HP | 177 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 280 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 10.2 seconds | 5.6 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 10.6 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Volvo XC70 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A6. On average, Volvo XC70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volvo XC70 is smaller, but higher. Volvo XC70 is 9 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 565 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC70 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. The Audi A6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`377 | ~ 2`338 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |