Volvo XC70 2004 vs Subaru Outback 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo XC70 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 210 HP | 165 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 400 NM | 226 - 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 11.5 seconds | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 11.1 | 8.5 - 10.5 | |
|
Volvo XC70 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Volvo XC70 is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 459 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1641 litres | 1649 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Outback may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 8 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`220 kg | ~ 1`944 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`695 kg | ~ 1`495 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 525 kg | ~ 449 kg | |
| Volvo XC70 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Subaru Outback. Therefore, Volvo XC70 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC70 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |
