Volvo XC70 2000 vs Honda CR-V 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo XC70
2000 - 2004
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.4 - 2.52.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 163 - 210 HP140 - 162 HP
Torque: 285 - 340 NM190 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 11.5 seconds10.6 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.6 - 11.36.7 - 10.1
Volvo XC70 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Volvo XC70 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.61 m
Width: 1.86 m1.78 m
Height: 1.56 m1.71 m
Volvo XC70 is larger, but lower.
Volvo XC70 is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC70 is 15 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres527 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1641 litres952 litres
Despite its longer length, Volvo XC70 has 42 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Volvo XC70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC70 (by 689 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC70 is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Volvo XC70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`220~ 1`910
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 24003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC70 has
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv