Volvo XC60 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 2013 engine produces 19 HP more power than Volvo XC60 2008, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo XC60 2008. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 11.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 2013 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2008, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 2013 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC60 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2013 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2013 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |