Volvo XC60 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 304 HP | 171 HP | |
Torque: | 440 NM | 233 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 133 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 207 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.3 | |
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). Nissan X-Trail 2014: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 25 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volvo XC60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
Volvo XC60 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo XC60 and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 497 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | no data | |
Volvo XC60 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 15 400 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |