Volvo XC60 2013 vs Peugeot 5008 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 95 HP more power than Peugeot 5008, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Peugeot 5008. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 5008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 5008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 5008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Volvo XC60 has 4x4: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 236 mm (9.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo XC70 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 5008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 and Peugeot 5008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 780 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 495 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1455 litres | 1940 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 485 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Peugeot 5008, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`270 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`834 kg | 1`380 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 436 kg | 820 kg | |
| Volvo XC60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is almost two times less than Peugeot 5008. Therefore, Peugeot 5008 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Peugeot 5008 has
| |