Volvo XC60 2013 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Volvo XC60 engine produces 25 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Audi Q5. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo XC70 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi Q5 2016 2.0 engine: The Audi 2.0 TDI from the EA288 family (engine code DETA, 190 hp) is a modern diesel designed to combine good performance with efficiency. In general it has a solid reputation and, when properly maintained, can exceed 300,000 km. Nevertheless, like most contemporary ... More about Audi Q5 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is smaller, but higher. Volvo XC60 is 2 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC60 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1455 litres | no data | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Volvo XC60 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`270 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`834 kg | 1`770 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 436 kg | 670 kg | |
| Volvo XC60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 54 procentiem less than Audi Q5. Therefore, Audi Q5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |