Volvo XC60 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 181 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 3 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, but torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 is 22 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1510 litres | |
Volvo XC60 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 55 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`280 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 15 400 | 10 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |