Volvo XC60 2013 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 3 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 20 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Volvo XC60 is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 495 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1577 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC60 has more luggage space (by 18 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 122 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Volvo XC60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |