Volvo XC60 2013 vs BMW X4 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 9 HP less power than BMW X4, but torque is 20 NM more than BMW X4. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X4 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
| Volvo XC60 is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1455 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`270 kg | 2`335 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`816 kg | 1`745 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 454 kg | 590 kg | |
| Volvo XC60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than BMW X4. Therefore, BMW X4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X4 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
BMW X4 has
| |