Volvo XC60 2013 vs BMW X3 2011

 
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
BMW X3
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 181 HP250 HP
Torque: 420 NM560 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds6.2 seconds
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo XC60 engine produces 69 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.0
Volvo XC60 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway1190 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.65 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.71 m1.66 m
Volvo XC60 and BMW X3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1455 litresno data
BMW X3 has more luggage space.
Volvo XC60 has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3.
Turning diameter: 11.7 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`270no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW X3 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 13 20010 600
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC60 has
  • fewer faults
BMW X3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv