Volvo XC60 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 2013 engine produces 103 HP more power than Volvo XC60 2009, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC60 2009. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 2013 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2009, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2013 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2013 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 9400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |