Volvo XC60 2013 vs BMW X3 2014

 
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
BMW X3
2014 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 306 HP184 HP
Torque: 400 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds8.2 seconds
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo XC60 engine produces 122 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 130 NM more than BMW X3. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.37.0
Real fuel consumption: 11.1 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Ground clearance: 230 mm (9.1 inches)204 mm (8 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years7 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW X3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.66 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.71 m1.66 m
Volvo XC60 is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1455 litres1600 litres
BMW X3 has more luggage space.
Volvo XC60 has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 145 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X3.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3902`270
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW X3 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16 00020 800
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC60 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW X3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv