Volvo XC60 2013 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 61 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Audi Q5. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Volvo XC60 2013 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time.
In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo XC60 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.63 m | |
| Volvo XC60 is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q5, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC60 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1560 litres | |
| Volvo XC60 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |