Volvo XC60 2013 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 15 HP more power than Audi Q5, but torque is 30 NM less than Audi Q5. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Volvo XC60 is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q5, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC60 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1455 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo XC60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`270 kg | 2`365 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`935 kg | 1`770 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 335 kg | 595 kg | |
| Volvo XC60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 78 procentiem less than Audi Q5. Therefore, Audi Q5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |