Volvo XC60 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012

 
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Honda CR-V
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds9.7 seconds
Volvo XC60 engine produces 13 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway960 km on highway
830 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%).

Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.57 m
Width: 1.89 m1.82 m
Height: 1.71 m1.69 m
Volvo XC60 is larger.
Volvo XC60 is 7 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres589 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1455 litres1669 litres
Honda CR-V has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo XC60 has 94 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Volvo XC60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 214 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V.
Gross weight (kg): 2`505no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 15 40011 800
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC60 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Honda CR-V has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv