Volvo XC60 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2009

 
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Volvo XC60
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP175 HP
Torque: 400 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds9.8 seconds
Volvo XC60 2009 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo XC60 2013 engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo XC60 2009, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60 2009. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.36.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volvo XC60 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo XC60 2013 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2009, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1320 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1520 km on highway1400 km on highway
920 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Volvo XC60 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes.

Ground clearance: 230 mm (9.1 inches)230 mm (9.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.89 m1.89 m
Height: 1.71 m1.71 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2013 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1455 litres1455 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2013 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60 2009.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`505
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 16 0009400
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.6/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo XC60 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv