Volvo XC60 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 14 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo XC60 and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Volvo XC60 has 360 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 422 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |