Volvo XC60 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 2013 engine produces 39 HP less power than Volvo XC60 2009, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo XC60 2009. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2009 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo XC60 2013 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2009, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC60 2013 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2013 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2013 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |