Volvo XC60 2013 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 4 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage capacity. Volvo XC60 has 83 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`291 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |