Volvo XC60 2008 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 2008 engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo XC60 2013, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo XC60 2013. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 2008 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 2008 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 2008 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volvo S80 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC60 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2008 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2008 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60 2013. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 15 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |