Volvo XC60 2008 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda CX-7. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Volvo XC60 is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC60 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 681 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |