Volvo XC60 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 75 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 is 11 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo XC60 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Volvo XC60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 500 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |