Volvo XC60 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2011 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 2011 engine produces 34 HP more power than Volvo XC60 2013, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC60 2013. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 2011 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 2011 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 2011 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 2011 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2011 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2011 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60 2013, which means Volvo XC60 2011 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 16 000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |