Volvo XC60 2011 vs BMW X3 2010

 
Volvo XC60
2011 - 2013
BMW X3
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 215 HP184 HP
Torque: 440 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds8.5 seconds
Volvo XC60 engine produces 31 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 60 NM more than BMW X3. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.85.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1260 km on highway
850 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 230 mm (9.1 inches)212 mm (8.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years17 years
Engine spread: Used also on Volvo XC70Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.65 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.71 m1.66 m
Volvo XC60 is 2 cm shorter than the BMW X3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC60 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1455 litres1600 litres
BMW X3 has more luggage space.
Volvo XC60 has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 145 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW X3, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`300
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Volvo XC60 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW X3, so Volvo XC60 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 940013 200
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC60 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
BMW X3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv