Volvo XC60 2008 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Volvo XC60 2008 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo XC60 2013, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60 2013. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 2008 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 2008 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 2008 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Volvo XC60 2008 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC60 2008 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2008 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2008 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60 2013. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volvo XC60 2013 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 2008 has serious deffects in 260 percent more cases than Volvo XC60 2013, so Volvo XC60 2013 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 15 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |