Volvo XC60 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Volvo XC60 has 4x4: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Volvo XC60 and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | no data | |
| Volvo XC60 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 8600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |