Volvo XC60 2009 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 2009 engine produces 37 HP less power than Volvo XC60 2013, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60 2013. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 2009 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2009 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 15 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |