Volvo XC60 2009 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 2009 engine produces 66 HP less power than Volvo XC60 2013, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC60 2013. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.7 | |
| Volvo XC60 2009 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 2009 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2009 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`835 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 690 kg | 605 kg | |
| Volvo XC60 2009 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Volvo XC60 2013. Therefore, Volvo XC60 2009 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volvo XC60 2013 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 2009 has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Volvo XC60 2013, so Volvo XC60 2013 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 12 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |