Volvo XC60 2009 vs Audi Q5 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 32 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.3 | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi Q5 2009 3.2 engine: This engine continues to suffer from a range of reliability concerns, many of which stem from cost-cutting on materials. One recurring issue involves low-grade gaskets used in critical areas like valve covers, ... More about Audi Q5 2009 3.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
| Volvo XC60 and Audi Q5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1455 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Volvo XC60 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`415 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 690 kg | 610 kg | |
| Volvo XC60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Audi Q5. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Volvo XC60 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi Q5, so Volvo XC60 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |